Thresholds for Genotoxic Carcinogens

Are genotoxic carcinogens more potent than nongenotoxic carcinogens?

In this report we have raised the question whether genotoxic carcinogens are more potent than nongenotoxic carcinogens when studied in long-term carcinogenicity assays in rodents. To build a large database of compounds for which both carcinogenicity and genotoxicity had been investigated, we have used a database produced by Gold and co-workers for carcinogenic potency data (975 chemicals) and a...

Hormesis in Carcinogenicity of Non-genotoxic Carcinogens

Recently the idea of hormesis, a biphasic dose-response relationship in which a chemical exerts opposite effects dependent on the dose, has attracted interest in the field of carcinogenesis. With non-genotoxic agents there is considerable experimental evidence in support of hormesis and the present review highlights current knowledge of doseresponse effects. In particular, several in vivo studi...

Interpretation of Margins of Exposure for Genotoxic Carcinogens Final Report

Carcinogenic risk assessment: are there dose thresholds for carcinogens?

While it has been generally accepted that genotoxic carcinogens have no dose threshold for their carcinogenic potential, there is increasing evidence that very low doses in fact are incapable of inducing tumours or preneoplastic lesions. Thus not only so-called epigenetic 'non-genotoxic' compounds like phenobarbital and benzene hexachloride, but also unequivocally genotoxic carcinogens like the...

Anomalous nonidentity between Salmonella genotoxicants and rodent carcinogens: nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens.

According to current data, the capacity to cause nonprogrammed or unscheduled cell proliferation in target tissues, a common characteristic of chemical carcinogens, may play a more important role in the development of tumors than does genotoxicity. This paper provides strong support for the validity of this conclusion. Ames-negative nongenotoxicants may be considered to be carcinogenic primaril...